Rogue Email With "Misinformation" Forced Boks to End Program Without Telling Council

Several previous posts have made clear Boks needs to blame everyone for his mistakes.

Concerning the spay/neuter voucher mess, he screwed up twice:

1.     ending the program;

2.     not talking to Council first.

This was the same deal with the Pitbull Academy. In that case, the major sin was not to have talked to Council first.

In his March 17 article, Rick Orlov writes:

Boks said he did not have time to provide advance notice to officials of his decision to suspend the voucher program.

"There was a rogue e-mail going around that I felt we had to respond to," Boks said. "There was a lot of misinformation that I wanted to correct, so I put out a message to the shelters. Then I informed the commissioners and city officials of what we were doing."

So Ed is blaming a rogue emailer for sending out MISINFORMATION that he needed to correct, and that’s why he ended the program immediately rather than going through communication channels. This does not make sense.

He does not identify who the rogue emailer is, nor what was said in that email that was the misinformation that he had to correct, and only then inform the Commissioners and City Officials what “we were [already] doing.”

Boks is making it sound like the program could have gone on for weeks more allowing plenty of time to go through channels except for that darn rogue email.

If there were an email that gave misinformation, you send out an email or post on Truth versus Rumor that there was an email with misinformation and then state what the facts were. You don’t state you were forced into a policy decision based on misinformation in someone else's email. This makes you look stupid. But this is what Boks said.

Now, what was the alleged misinformation? Ed never says what misinformation was being put out.

In fact, the email I had forwarded to me written by Brenda Bosch (which was posted earlier) on March 10, 25 hours before Ed’s statement of the voucher program’s temporary ending, gave exactly the same information as his March 11 flyer. As a matter of fact, it gives the exact same termination time for the program, March 11, as did Ed in his March 11 flyer.

So, can anyone identify who the mysterious “rougue emailer” is and the content of that email—especially the “misinformation” that forced Boks to immediately end the program without waiting even a day or two to contact Cardenas, Zine or Alarcon?