tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25037502.post436316190773567689..comments2024-03-16T04:40:25.964-07:00Comments on LA Animal Watch: Criticize Boks for the Right ReasonsEd Muzikahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13214241089861837159noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25037502.post-89004508560772364572007-04-06T09:46:00.000-07:002007-04-06T09:46:00.000-07:00I think this posting above reflects a pensive and ...I think this posting above reflects a pensive and very worthy viewpoint. I hope this person is contributing often.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-25037502.post-91874395285274032732007-03-20T11:31:00.000-07:002007-03-20T11:31:00.000-07:00I agree that PR is important to help save animals...I agree that PR is important to help save animals. If that PR is not saving more animals, it's not effective. He needs to concentrate on programs that are effective at saving lives. Just saying "we're going to be nokill!" and "were saving puppies!" does not make you nokill. He needs to actually do the work, then he can brag about it. <BR/><BR/>I think he should be doing his "truth vs rumor" reports. Of course they should be honest. I feel some of his reports were honest, some were not. He can't say that the death rate is lower when it's actually higher. He can't say he never sent lewd photos when he did. He can't say he never had anything to do with the support blogs when he most certainly did. Lying is wrong. If he lies about one thing, how can he expect anyone to believe anything he says.<BR/><BR/>I don't think having a match.com page is objectionable. It does show poor judgement to have a singles page when you are not single. He was in a "committed" relationship with his NY girlfriend at the time. A few of us met her when she came to LA. It also shows poor character to lie in a singles ad. He lied about his physical appearance and a few other things. Once a liar, always a liar. <BR/><BR/>I don't have a problem with him renaming programs, if it helps save animals. If he's doing it to just make it seem like he's creating new programs and doing a "great" job, that is not acceptable. I don't have a problem with him doing anything IF it saves animals. A lot of the PR he did was for his own image, only. <BR/><BR/>Currently he is holding animals longer than before. In most cases, it's not to help the animal. It's to help his numbers. If a big old brown pitbull hasn't been adopted in a month, why keep it six more months then kill it? <BR/><BR/>I agree with the rest of what you wrote.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com