Animal shelters overcrowded
Los Angeles animal shelters are seeing a record number of furry friends - and euthanasias - as a result of the down economy.
The shelters are so overcrowded that the Department of Animal Services is offering two-for-one cat adoptions to make room for a feline influx.
Rescue groups, taxed to capacity, are desperate to find homes for thousands of unwanted pets.
"We need some recuperation," said Kathy Davis, interim general manager of the department. "We're certainly hoping at some point that the economy will recover and, as a by-product, people will quit turning their animals in.
"There are record high numbers for recent years."
The surge in abandoned pets has continued unabated since May 2008, when soaring job losses and home foreclosures were fueling an increase in surrendered dogs and cats at city shelters.
In the fiscal year ending June 30, the number of dogs and cats turned in to the city's six animal shelters rose 14 percent to 55,742 - the highest in five years, according to city data.
But while pet adoptions increased 24 percent, so have the number of animals killed, with cats bearing the brunt of euthanasias.
"The rescue groups are not only at over-capacity," said Missy Woodward, of Reseda, on the board of Stray Cat Alliance. "Due to the economy, people are opening their doors and letting the animals go because they have nowhere to take them.
"There's a desperate need for people to take in pets and spay and
Despite a spay/neuter law implemented last fall, the department destroyed nearly 13,000 cats, a 30 percent increase, while unweaned kitten kills rose 41 percent in 12 months.
And while the six city shelters exceed capacity by hundreds of animals, nowhere is the problem more severe than the East Valley shelter in Van Nuys - the epicenter of unwanted pets.
On Tuesday, the shelter harbored 455 animals - about 100 over its capacity.
Last week, it shipped 21 dogs to a shelter in Santa Cruz, with more slated to be transferred next month. In addition, animals are being distributed to other city shelters.
"I'm seeing a lot of people turning in their animals because they've either moved or lost their houses," said Capt. Helen Brakemeier, manager of the shelter. "We've also seen a lot of litters of kittens.
"It's not just that we're full, but the rescue groups are full. Too many animals, not enough homes."
The increase has incited animal welfare activists, who say the shelters are "red listing" up to 40 cats a day - animals in immediate danger of euthanasia.
Adding to the pressure is a decision made Tuesday by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to halve the mandated adoption time from six days to three, and decrease funds to shelters as part of the 2010 state budget.
"I think it's a sad time for the animals in California," said Judie Mancuso, founder of Social Compassion in Legislation, an animal welfare advocacy group. "It creates a heavy burden to shelters across the state."
Davis said that the minimum holding period for adoptable pets in Los Angeles shelters will not change, despite the governor's action, with the average adoption period of nine to 12 days.
"Our mission is, we're holding animals as long as we have space," she said.
Critics, however, called for a complete rethinking of animal shelter policies in order to achieve the city's stated no-kill goal.
"Our shelters are failing," said Ed Muzika of LA Animal Watch, a Northridge-based blog. "When you kill 4,000 animals more than last year, it's not success.
He said despite more than 40,000 free spay/neuter vouchers passed out by the city last year, cat impounds have increased dramatically. He questioned whether the city's spay-neuter law, which had required owners to fix their pets since October, may be forcing those who can't afford surgeries to surrender pets to city shelters instead.
"In order for no-kill to be realized," said Muzika, "the (department) needs a top-down analysis by the nation's top no-kill experts."
Davis said it may take three to five years to see results from the city's spay/neuter ordinance. Meanwhile, she said gradual improvements are being made.
A nonprofit program to encourage pet owners in South Los Angeles to keep their pets has saved 800 dogs and cats since January, she said.
And the two-for-one-cat "Summer Buddies" program sponsored by the Found Animal Foundation at the East Valley and Harbor shelters is in effect through August.
On Tuesday, children at the Van Nuys shelter cooed over 1 1/2-week old kittens being raised until they're old enough to adopt.
"He looks like a hamster," said one girl. "How cute."
Said Brakemeier: "We're pulling out all the punches to do anything we can to get people in here so we can save these animals' lives."
Los Angeles animal shelters will host a half-off adoption fair, Aug. 19-23. For information, seewww.laanimalservices.com.
10 comments:
That's good news. I read Dana's article and although it gives some of the facts it really sounds as if he is drinking the Kool Aid of LA Animal Services when he says the increase in impounds is greatly from foreclosures. Maybe we should start having candlelight vigils outside the shelters at night telling them to stop the murder now. We could ask every employee as they exited whether they are the euthanasianists who kill helpless cats and dogs. If our group just kept getting bigger and bigger with photos of the condemned animals the media would surely cover it all. We could really make a big deal out of it. They would have to pay cops overtime to watch over things which LA's Mayor and City Council wouldn't like at all. Our theme could be "Stop the Killing Now!!!" If the Mayor and City Council were committed they could say "No More Killing, It's No Longer Allowed -- Find Another Solution." I wonder what company makes the chemicals which are used in their killing field? A popular boycott against their other products would cause them great concern. We need to get into the driver's seat and control the monsters who are any part of this chain of killing innocent animals whose only crime is their mere existence.
Dear Haters:
1. Continuing to blame Boks for the situation is not productive.
2. Ignoring the economic downturn's impact on owner-turn-ins is not sensible.
You continue to deny the source of all the animals the residents of Los Angeles are turning in all day every day.
The residents of Los Angeles do not confine their animals, they do not spay or neuter and when it comes time to spend money on them, those animals are turned in at shelters -- all day every day.
Go hang around intake at EV and watch all your neighbors turn in their pets all day every day. Is that because of Boks policies?
Continuing to blame Boks might vent your hatred, but accomplishes little.
Son-of-Naysayer
Again Son, you refuse to read the entire post and pick only what you want.
LAAS does not post the source of the animals coming in, whether owner turn ins, public surrenders, or filed seizures. They could, and that would help the public understand the issue.
Nor do they post whether the turned in animals are fixed or not. I believe Brad Jensen posted statistics that the vast majority of turn ins to the County were fixed, therefore, S/N programs are of lesser value.
To deny that Boks MAY be part of the current problem is misguided. There was lots of evidence posted, including photos, of shelters turning away turn-ins for period 2 summers ago. Animals not turned in then may be turned in now, or if it were feral kittens that were refused, then they are feral cats entering the system.
For County, owner turn ins were a little more than 1/3. If the same stat holds for the City, of the 55,000 animals impounded, about 35,000 come off the street and are not owner turn ins. In fact, County stats showed the largest source of animals was from filed operations impoundments.
LAAS can and should provide stats like this so we can better understand the problem and the cure.
Blame Boks... blame Barth... it doesn't matter. The problem of shelters being overcrowded is a reality. Rescue groups are overloaded. No matter how many adoptions there are, the influx of cast off animals continues. Instead of blaming everyone, what solutions do any of you have? If they run out of space, what are they suppose to do with all the animals they have coming in every day? They get reamed for putting too many animals in one cage... and for keeping animals too long. By no means am I in favor of the high amount of euthanization taking place... or any animals being euthanized... but instead of playing the blame game, please, offer some solutions.
I have offered 2 solutions. Both suggest that business as usual at LAAS will never improve the situation much. The whole system has to be intellectually dismantled and reconstructed in a way that works much better. Gradualistic improvements have not worked.
I suggested getting Winograd in to do one of his audits that will shake up the system from bottom to top. This will get media attention and maybe the mayor's attention.
Or, if Boks is right and it is poorly perfoming employees who are the problem, and they are protected by Civil Service and the unions, then we have to figure out a way to get rid of the unions or find new union contracts, such as taking LAAS private.
I am absolutely certain that just making program or protocol suggestions out of the context of complete reorganization will only result in a 2% improvement per year, not the 30-50% changes that have occurred after a Winograd audit, such as in Reno, and for the first year at Philly.
Kathy mentions FA funding cat discounts as a short term program. That is all well and good, but we need massive amounts of new volunteers, a huge expansion of fosters, changes in the law allowing more animals to be kept, etc.
My making one or two suggestions certainly is not going to help. It is essential that you see a few suggestions won't help a dysfunctional system.
Pages 80 and 81 of the report submitted by the Spay/Neuter Advisory Committee in March 2009 provides an insight into where s/n efforts need to be focused. Stats are from calendar year 2008 animal records provided by LAAS. New Hope Rescues and Adoptions were NOT included because LAAS has no method in place to document sex on impound vs sex at outcome.
For example, a dog may be unaltered (M/F) at the time of impound but if the dog is altered and then adopted, sex of the dog is then changed to altered (N/S). Records will not accurately reflect the sex of the dog AT the time of impound.
Page 80 shows all dog impounds except new hope rescues and those adopted by District
Page 81 shows all dog impounds 1 year or older except new hope rescues and those adopted by District
Largest number or percentage of UNALTERED dogs entering LAAS shelters are from:
District 8 Benard Parks
District 9 Jan Perry
District 10 Herb Wesson
District 15 Janice Hahn
Largest number or percentage of ALTERED dogs entering LAAS shelters are from:
District 2 Wendy Greul
District 3 Dennis Zine
District 11 Bill Rosendahl
District 12 Greig Smith
Additionally... my guess, since Linda Barth and Dara Ball have made the decision NOT to release licensing information of dog impounds because tag types and tag numbers are considered personal information, is that city districts with the largest numbers of unaltered pets is where licensing efforts should take place.
Brad Jensen
Cypress, CA
.
Boks had more staff than any other General Manager and should have been able to perform great deeds. Unfortunately, his mid-management staff was more incompetent than Boks and advised him poorly.
Boks accepted the excuse from his staff that employees could not be fired because of the Unions and Civil Service protection. Nothing could be further from the truth. City employees are fired by other Departments. Check the records. It makes you wonder why they can't be fired in this Department. Couldn't be incompetence could it?
Fire all of them. Killing an animal is a crime. For every animal intake, that person is a conspirator in the killing; count one, count two and three times tens of thousands of murders, all day, every day.
Get rid of the killers, save the lives. Bunch of crimminals.
Said Brakemeier: "We're pulling out all the punches to do anything we can to get people in here so we can save these animals' lives."
I see she hasn't gotten any more eloquent since she hijacked Stu's "not dangerous" report and punched it into a death warrant.
It's the people, Ed. You know that. All of them. They expect failure and death and that's just what they get.
This would be a great time, while between General Managers, to have an internal audit done of this Department. By internal, I mean within the City family.
I would suspect that when this audit is complete, it will show that not just field enforcement, but areas such as public relations, training, human resources, accounting are so out of touch with the rest of the City that it will be easy to pinpoint where and what needs to be changed.
Just look at the fiasco the opening of the shelters created. Who was put in charge of that highly politically sensitive program? A department insider who had no clue as to what to do and had been so inept in her prior assignment that she was transferred to perform this task. We all know the end result.
The audit must look beyond field enforcement. The City can't wait for a new General Manager to be appointed and then try to determine who needs to go. This should be done before this person starts. The previous commenter was correct. It is amazing how many incompetent administrators there are in this Department. This must be some type of discipline in that they can't cut it in another Department, so they find their way to Animal Services and continue their dastardly deeds. How and why are these people selected? An audit should be done and these administrators should be held accountable for the findings. It is like a country club over there.
Does anyone have any connections with the Mayor's office or City Council to help make this happen?
Post a Comment