Yet another ADL watchdog

I am struck by the absence of reason and evidence in any of ADL’s postings. There is just charge after charge, criticism after criticism, without one shred of proof. I am also amazed how quickly they can change their spots.

Six months ago she was attacking Stuckey for having been a black hired by Hahn to woo the black community. Then, two months later after Stuckey was fired, ADL expressed anger that the black guy was run out of town on a rail to hire a white guy she didn’t like.

What is at the core of ADL’s random ranting and inane and baseless charges? Why did they start attacking Boks a few weeks after he got the job?

Two years ago the ADL got it right most of the time, because she just wanted change. Since January 3, they have been floating posts that have little to do with reality. They just make them up. See if any of their postings have any proof. The ADL says they do careful research, but there is no evidence of any research. They post emails, supposedly from volunteers or employees that are obviously just made up. Not one name, not one document, not once source is ever cited.

The Big Lie. Repeat an accusation loud enough and often enough and people will believe you.

In the past the administration never countered the charges, they just counter-attacked the ADL which left the charges unanswered, which increased their credibility.

Any posts left here too will be 100% confidential. I am new at this blogging stuff, but the software is supposed to filter out anything but your username, which you create when signing in to give a comment.

Take a look at the first Watch Blog.