Urban Wildlife Wins Lawsuit Against City; TNR illegal Until CEQA Done

This is from birdchasers.blogspot.com. The director of Urban Wildlands Group, Dr. Longcore, even recommends catching and killing 50% of feral cats as the preferred way to control ferals. He claims TNR CANNOT be successful, that a 70% S/N rate is not attainable in practice.

His weapon of choice against cats in the past is lawsuits and legislation.

On the other hand, it is inexcusable the City has not performed a CEQA study in four years. They claim colony managers have not supplied data on real colonies within the City that would allow a proper CEQA study. 

Do they blame managers for not telling the City where their colonies are?

In other cities, where similar studies have been done, the cities have contracted with a third party research group or animal grop to conduct the study so that specific information about colonies is not given to the entity that might kill the cats or order a colony disbanded. 

But the Mayor's office never went this route. Repeated inquiries to Ed Boks in the past, and a single inquiry to Kathy davis on the state of the study went unanswered.  The City has stonewalled cooperation from the animal community because of a gag order from the Mayor's Office.

The City has to contract with an independent agency to conduct that portio of the study that deals with real tie and real world colony experience in LA.

Alley Cat Allies and HSUS haves been absolutely useless regarding this issue. Both have been sent all the info, and the extent of inolvement from either has been for ACA to send scientific info to the Mayor's study group. They also have done nothing with regard to the County feral cat kill program. Both groups are useless and I urge readers to stop sending them donations. let LA donations dry up and we will see some action on their part.

The songbirds of Los Angeles may get a reprieve from feral cat predation. Six conservation groups won a lawsuit on Friday against the City of Los Angeles and its Department of Animal Services to stop the practice of encouraging feral cat colonies until the legally required environmental impact reviews are performed.

The Los Angeles Superior Court found that the City of Los Angeles had been “secretly and unofficially” promoting “Trap-Neuter-Return,” a controversial program to allow feral cats to run free, even while the Department of Animal Services promised to conduct an environmental review of the program. The Court ordered the City to stop implementing TNR. The plaintiffs, The Urban Wildlands Group, Endangered Habitats League, Los Angeles Audubon Society, Palos Verdes/South Bay Audubon Society, Santa Monica Bay Audubon Society, and the American Bird Conservancy, sued the City in June 2008 to ensure that the controversial program to sanction and maintain feral cat colonies was not implemented before a full and public environmental analysis.

The groups decided legal action was necessary after their investigation revealed that the City had been unofficially implementing a so-called “Trap-Neuter-Return” program and the City repeatedly declined their request to stop implementing the program until environmental review was performed.

Although the City insisted that no such program existed, the Court concurred with the conservation groups and concluded in its Friday ruling that, “implementation of the program is pervasive, albeit ‘informal and unspoken.’”

“Our goal was to see that the City follows the California Environmental Quality Act by thoroughly assessing the program’s impacts on the environment and considering alternatives and mitigation measures before making specific programmatic decisions,” said Babak Naficy, attorney for plaintiffs. “Feral cats have a range of impacts to wildlife, human health, and water quality in our cities. The impacts of institutionalizing the maintenance of feral cat colonies through TNR should be discussed in an open, public process before any such program is implemented,” Naficy said.

In June 2005, the Los Angeles Board of Animal Services Commissioners adopted TNR as the “preferred method of dealing with feral cat populations as its official policy.” Thereafter, the Board directed the General Manager to prepare an analysis of the program under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). This analysis was never completed but the Department implemented major portions of the program anyway.

The Department issued coupons for free or discounted spay/neuter procedures for feral cats being returned to neighborhoods and open spaces, including parks and wildlife areas. It also began refusing to accept trapped feral cats or to issue permits to residents to trap feral cats. The Department assisted outside organizations that performed TNR by donating public space, advertising their services, and referring the public to their TNR programs. The Department even encouraged and assisted in establishing new feral cat colonies at City-owned properties.

The Superior Court recognized these actions as illegal implementation of the TNR program that could have an impact on the environment and enjoined the City from further pursuing the program until it complied with CEQA. Dr. Travis Longcore, Science Director of The Urban Wildlands Group, said, “Feral cats are documented predators of native wildlife. We support spaying and neutering all cats in Los Angeles, which is the law, but do not support release of this non-native predator into our open spaces and neighborhoods where they kill birds and other wildlife.”

Even when fed by humans, cats instinctively hunt prey, including birds, lizards and small mammals. Colonies of feral cats, often thriving with the aid of handouts from humans, harm native wildlife and contaminate water bodies with fecal bacteria. Longcore continued, “TNR is promoted as a way to reduce feral cat populations but scientific research shows that 70–90% of cats must be sterilized for cat populations to decline. This is virtually impossible to achieve in practice, but population reduction can be achieved with only 50% removal.”

The City must now stop its TNR program and any further proposal to implement such a program must undergo objective scientific review as part of the CEQA process. This will ensure that the public has adequate opportunity to comment and that significant impacts on parks, wildlife, water quality, and human health are avoided.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

They'd rather us not TNR? The population would obviously be a whole lot worse! I know they want to just trap and kill. F'n idiots!