Boks Spins an Impossibly Rosy Future

Ed Boks is the Truth-Challenged General Manager of Los Angeles Animal Services. Ed is a master spin-master. He can make Armageddon feel like a cooling summer breeze. He squeezes Animal Shelter statistics until they confess to his distortions. He is a side-show ringmaster, orchestrating fiascos such as the Hooters for Neuters event that netted LAAS nothing, but him, notoriety.

Recently the Daily News published an article about Boks and the veterinarian shortage. Boks made it seem that the problem will be fixed this fall using students and faculty of the vet program at Western University.

The Western University veterinarian program does not have any buildings. The University itself does have several buildings, but the vet program does not. Their website has a "rendition" of the vet school building, which means it does not exist. It has not graduated any students. It is not accredited. They have no shelter medicine program.

I am not knocking the school, and agree it is a great idea for the future, but I am knocking Boks' claim they will rescue LAAS this fall. We need ten more vets now--desperately.

The whole article is PR fiction, a pipe dream, typical Boks’ wishful thinking. He cannot distinguish between his fantasizing and reality. I really think he believes what he says could happen, will happen.

Boks says LAAS starting vet salary is $92,000. This is a lie. Current vet salaries are listed on the LAAS website. A Veterinarian I’s starting salary is $80,868 and a Vet II is $83,352. Even the Chief Vet starts at $87,499. Boks must not look at his own website.

A week ago Zine and Alarcon moved that Personnel should do a study on what it would take to bring 10 new vets here. This, of course, involves fixing salaries at a competitive level. I think Boks knows it will be $92,000, so that is what he told Bartholemew. This is Boks’ wishful thinking, confusing future possibilities with present reality.

The first quarter shelter numbers, like last year, APPEAR to look good until the second quarter, when the mass murders begin. Boks holds animals as long as he can, massively overcrowding the shelters, so that the first quarter stats look good and can fool simple minded people like me into believing that all is rosy and No-Kill happened last Thursday.

The 2007 first quarter stats look only microscopically better than last year’s. After 15 months, 1.25 years, the self-proclaimed No-Kill guru has brought the euthanasia rate down from 41% to 40%. If we set No-Kill at a 10% euthanasia rate, we'll be there in 2045.

The shelters are overcrowded with animals that have little chance of being adopted, creating a catastrophe in the making. Crowding can magnify any disease outbreak and could result in hundreds of animals being killed, as in Reno a few months ago, where 1,000 animals were killed over a weekend.

The in-shelter death rates under Boks have been climbing ever since he came aboard and we can expect them to climb much higher. The major killing will begin in May. Like last year, he will blame it on a horrendous kitten season, even though the kitten season, the year before under the previous General Manager, Guerdon Stuckey, was much worse.

Every month since Boks became GM, cats are getting screwed. In No-Kill or even low-kill shelters, many fewer cats, including ferals, are killed and most unweaned kittens are saved. Not in LA. Last year 5,889 of all cats impounded were killed their first day in the shelter, and 5,622 out of 7,341 unweaned kittens were killed during the past 12 months.

Philadelphia, San Francisco and Charlottesville save most of their unweaned kittens because they have extraordinary bottle-feeding foster volunteers who later adopt, or find homes for the kittens. LAAS’ bottle-baby program is almost non-existent. LAAS has shown no ability to enroll or keep its volunteers in any area.

After 15 months, even under strong pressure from the Animal Services Commission and the humane community, Boks still not prepared a plan for a No-Kill LA. We have no idea where he is taking LAAS, and apparently he does not either.

All of LAAS’ improvements are in Boks’ mind or the distant future.

Los Angeles deserves a real No-Kill General Manager, someone, unlike Boks, who actually spends time at the shelters, analyzes the operations, then makes things work.


Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

Isn't Philadelphia Animal Care and Control unionized? They are experiencing great success. Boks knew LAAS was a union shop before he came here. No one forced him to come here.

I resent that Ed Boks came to LA and is accomplishing nothing but broadcasting lies about his no kill success in LA and is trying to fool the locals, while the animals are being slaughtered. The animals deserve much better. The animals should not have to suffer while we spoon feed a self-proclaimed no kill LEADER. Someone else could do a much better job. Boks is just here for an inflated salary that he clearly does not deserve and for the California lifestyle that he has so much time to pursue while animals are dying. He needs to leave LA and open up the position for someone who is qualified, dedicated and truly cares about the animals. We have had over a year of his BS stories and utter lies. Many animals have died because of it. While Boks is too greedy to be ashamed of himself. He is cut-throat and make no mistake it is he that is the taker! All of his lies and attempts to fool the locals are insulting and provide all the insight needed to assess that he is pure evil. The worst part is that his purposeful deceit is directly responsible for the killing of our animals. And for this I despise him. The sooner he is gone, the better chance our animals have at staying alive. The objective is to save the animals from being killed, not make endless excuses for and financially support Ed Boks. His evil selfishness is literally killing our animals. Boks is a disgrace and he needs to go!

Anonymous said...

Finding vets to do spay/neuter all day is not easy. And LA is in competition with other areas for these vets as well. It would be a repetitious job actually and everyone wants variety in their job. In addition is the problems with LA and what person in their right mind would want to step into the middle of it.

Anonymous said...

I hope that if and when LAAS hires more vets that they are doing more than spay/neuter all day long. Some of the animals impounded have injuries and others are sick. Then, there are the newborns and the senior animals. I think there would be plenty of variety. Also, outside spay/neuter clinics do just that, s/n, all day long. There's no reason to believe that other areas pay new vets more than LA does, except perhaps SF or NY. If a vet has experience, then of course they are making more than the starting salary. A new vet can expect to make in the 80-90K range. They usually have a student loan of about 80K to repay. I would expect the new LAAS vets to take a lead in saving lives. You know, like in a No Kill environment.