One commenter said Winograd's Rancho consult was a disaster. Someone sent the Rancho and County stats. They sounded really good for Rancho, a vindication of Nathan, even though he never claimed Rancho a success.
Then Brad Jensen posted the comment below that 1,000 animals were missing from their stats! That is 20%.
Therefore, any Rancho stats are worthless and they don't prove anything one way or another.
I'll leave the comments below.
Strangeky, looking at the rabies reports submitted to the state by LAAS and their published stats, they are thousands apart also.