A reader has left a comment below that I should not post things about LAAS without verifying that information--apparently because the posted information makes them look bad.
My retort is, how do I verify any information about the internal workings of LAAS?
Boks is not talking to me, nor Bickhart nor Barth. There is never any response to my posts except through Boks' Truth bs Rumor section on the LAAS website.
My information comes from volunteers, tipsters, ADL, people who have gripes against the department, my requests for public documents, etc.
I have posted many comments when insiders want to give opposite information.
If someone in the department wants me to post their point of view and numbers they can contact me by email or leave a comment on this blog. For example, is Boks getting a $20,000 raise or not? Did Linda Barth get a substantial raise?
Remember, I made a post that said ADL was wrong about the salary figures.
Regarding the truthfulness of Boks, remember his vindication response about the ACTF raid on Mason?
Remember that Boks told Bartholomew that many of Mason's cats would be fostered and not one was? Remember he said Muffin was sitting on a dead cat's body when actual photos showed no bodies?
Remember when Ed refused to release information on Mason's cats, even their location for three months stating he could not, when in fact it was his option.
Remember when Boks said LAAS was the largets adoption agency in the US, when later he changed it to "one of the largest" and later to #4 in the country?
So, whose information do I trust?
Also see the GREAT post below!